Filter Preferential Entailment for the Logic of Action in Almost Continuous Worlds
نویسنده
چکیده
Mechanical systems, of the kinds which are of interest for qualitative reasoning, are characterized by a set of real-valued parameters, each of which is a piecewise continuous function of real-valued time. A temporal logic is introduced which allows the description of parameters, both in their continuous intervals and around their breakpoints, and which also allows the description of actions being performed in sequence or in parallel. If axioms are given which characterize physical laws, conditions and effects of actions, and observations or goals at specific points in time, one wishes to identify sets of actions ("plans") which account for the observations or obtain the goals. The paper proposes preference criteria which should determine the model set for such axioms. It is shown that conventional preferential entailment is not sufficient. A modified condition, filter preferential entailment is defined where preference conditions and axiom satisfaction conditions are interleaved.
منابع مشابه
A modal perspective on defeasible reasoning
We introduce various new supraclassical entailment relations for defeasible reasoning and investigate some of their relationships. The contrapositive of the usual nonmonotonic preferential entailment turns out to be a monotonic supraclassical entailment. Analogously to these two, a nonmonotonic and its contrapositive monotonic supraclassical entailment can be defined by using modal operators re...
متن کاملA Nonmonotonic Extension of KLM Preferential Logic P
In this paper, we propose the logic Pmin , which is a nonmonotonic extension of Preferential logic P defined by Kraus, Lehmann and Magidor (KLM). In order to perform nonmonotonic inferences, we define a “minimal model” semantics. Given a modal interpretation of a minimal A-world as A ∧ ¬A, the intuition is that preferred, or minimal models are those that minimize the number of worlds where ¬ ¬A...
متن کاملInaccessible Worlds and Irrelevance: Preliminary Report
Recently, the relationship between several forms of default reasoning based on conditional defaults has been investigated. In particular, the systems based on ε-semantics, preferential models, and (fragments of) modally-defined conditional logics have been shown to be equivalent. These systems form a plausible core for default inference, but are too weak in general, failing to deal adequately w...
متن کاملOn the compactness property of extensions of first-order G"{o}del logic
We study three kinds of compactness in some variants of G"{o}del logic: compactness,entailment compactness, and approximate entailment compactness.For countable first-order underlying language we use the Henkinconstruction to prove the compactness property of extensions offirst-order g logic enriched by nullary connective or the Baaz'sprojection connective. In the case of uncountable first-orde...
متن کاملEntailment, Duality, and the Forms of Reasoning
We explore the notion of duality for defeasible entailment relations induced by preference orderings on states. We then show that such preferential entailment relations may be used to characterise Peircean inductive and abductive reasoning. Interpreting the preference relations as accessibility relations establishes modular Gödel-Löb logic as the modal logic of inductive and abductive reasoning. §
متن کامل